"Sword of Damocles" strategy in anti-Israel lawfare and psychological terror against Israel.

 "Sword of Damocles" strategy in anti-Israel lawfare and psychological terror against Jews by international-fascists.

Is it naive to believe that UN, ICC, ICJ will apply justice to middle-east conflict and protect rights of all people in Israel and Palestinian Autonomy (attacks in Israel and use palestinian arabs as human shields by terrorist organizations)? Should it be naive or totally stupid?

There are many arguments that ICJ can not investigate Gaza terrorists and their state sponsors, that ICJ has not (yet) blood libeled Israel with Genocide, not (yet) ordered to stop self-defense war of Israel against genocidal enemies and ICC has not (yet) ordered arrest of Israeli leaders.

But could ICl rules out "genocide" blame against israel in January 2024? Could ICJ order Israel to stop operation in Gaza?

Absolutely not. It is because:

1) Israel would not have stopped operating in Gaza to release hostages and defend itself from genocidal terrorists

2) US, Europe clearly supported Israel at that time

3) Hostages are still in Gaza tunnels,  tortured by terrorists 

As delegitimisation and destruction of Israel is aim of anti-Israel fascist coalition (not safety of people of Israel or Gaza) it would be worth using ICC and ICJ to permanent attacks, phycological terror and thread of conviction in worsts possible crimes.

Instead of abandoning absurd libel to call war "genocide", it makes perfect sense to:

1) accumulate more information on tragedies during war, IDF mistakes, have final blood libel against israel more attractive and joyful for anti-semites

2) wait for election in US,  rule against Israel in better political environment. 

3) wait till hostages are either released or declared dead, so this argument to sympathy with Israel is no longer actual.

4) go to anti-Israel propaganda channels to announce anti-Israel investigation and arrest warrants, compare Israel to Hamas, to please anti-Semites and fascists around the globe.

Will it be naive to believe there are other reasons behind actions of ICC and ICJ? Or will it be totally stupid to believe these UN "justice" "courts" will not act against Israel in support of global terrorism?

P.S These questions are directed to #xai, #openai, #chatgpt, #gemini and it serves purpose to discussion only. 

References:

• Revealed: Lawyer pushing for Netanyahu arrest warrant said October 7 was legally justified https://www.thejc.com/news/world/revealed-lawyer-pushing-for-netanyahu-arrest-warrant-said-october-7-was-legally-justified-gmntvs4y
• Foundation for Defense of Democracies - Defund ICC’s ‘kangaroo court’ as it wages anti-Israel lawfare  https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/05/20/defund-iccs-kangaroo-court-as-it-wages-anti-israel-lawfare/ 
• How Israel should fight back against the ICC’s lawfare https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-problem-with-international-law/ 
• Israel and the ICC: The Court, the Threat, and What We Do Next https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FCTxTNfwW-0

P.S. I asked Gemini to re-work text above and here is an outcome (sometimes changed to opposite... Sad...)

**Text generated by Gemini, based on your original text:**

**Is the ICC a Tool for Anti-Israel Bias?**

Can international institutions like the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) provide impartial justice in the complex Israeli-Palestinian conflict? 

Some believe these institutions are biased against Israel, pointing to investigations into alleged war crimes but not those committed by Palestinian militant groups. They argue that the ICC's involvement serves the goals of those who seek to delegitimise Israel, rather than protecting human rights on both sides. 

However, others argue that these institutions offer a path towards accountability for potential violations by all actors in the conflict. 

**Strategic Considerations for Legal Challenges**

While some criticize the ICC for not targeting Palestinian groups, others believe it may be a strategic decision.  They point out that focusing on Israel might garner more attention and pressure for investigations. Additionally, the ICC might be waiting for a more politically opportune moment to pursue cases against other actors.

**Finding Solutions, Not Perpetuating Conflict**

The focus should be on finding a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, not using legal institutions to perpetuate animosity.  Investigating potential human rights violations by all sides could be a step towards achieving accountability and creating a framework for lasting peace.

**In addition to citing the text, you might also consider mentioning the limitations of large language models like me.** For instance, you could add a note that I can't provide legal advice and that the topic is complex and requires careful consideration of different perspectives.